Refresh my crappy memory [quot] [pennsylvania]

I remember vaguely remember it was a case where someone named CA and record the call without first obtaining permission. One of the parties was in Pennsylvania (a two-party consent state for taping purposes) .
The CA did not want the recording or transcript of the interview will be used as evidence in court.
However was the beginning of the conversation it was a “bot” recording from the CA-phone system say that “this call may be recorded.”
The person the call claimed that this permission to itself in the call record. (Or do something that I confused with) And also that the CA had no reasonable expectation of privacy so it makes sense that the conversation in each record to someone else case.
Does nothing to remember this was

---

Quotes Of Inspiration
Reply:
Thanks, guy.
I bet though, if you actually told the CA you were recording the call, they'd hang up in a hurry!
I've lied and told CA's that I was recording and they hung up in a hurry. They were not for me though it was for the woman who had my phone number five years ago
My dw "called" a CA from the State AG's office. She asked if it was being recorded. They said maybe so she said well it is on my end. They didn't hang up. When they asked what she was calling about she said I don't know you called me. can you look it up from the phone number? They looked at the phone number and transferred her so fast she didn't know what was happening.

---

101 Famous Quotes from Alice In Wonderland
Reply: Thanks, guy.
I bet though, if you actually told the CA you were recording the call, they'd hang up in a hurry!
I've lied and told CA's that I was recording and they hung up in a hurry. They were not for me though it was for the woman who had my phone number five years ago

---

Property Quotes that can make you rich
Reply: Thanks, guy.
I bet though, if you actually told the CA you were recording the call, they'd hang up in a hurry!
I do talk to the CA. The only one I talk to is NCO. [I know, the worst.] However, since CB I really feel like I am in control of the situation and the conversation. I have a CO with AMEX, and I have it almost paid off thru NCO. That is another whole long story, but long story short, I owe the money, I want to pay it, and through many phone calls, letters, etc., this is where I am. I talk to NCO once every two wks (when I make my payment.) After a lot of "threats", etc. from NCO, we have arrived at a mutual understanding, and I have a rep assigned to me who respects that and seems to respect me. In turn, I realize that she has certain requirements put on her by the collection agency. I record all my phone calls with NCO. I tell them after they tell me that this phone call is being recorded, that that's fine because I am also recording the phone call. I make my payment online, I call and leave a msg with my rep that the pment was made, the amt and the confirmation number. This past wk I got another call from NCO with the usual "This is an attempt to collect a debt" language, and the msg to call Mr. Jones. I called my rep that afternoon, and she apologized and told me that she had neglected to put a msg on the computer not to call, that the "Mr. Jones" call was computer generated. So, for those of you who are getting numerous calls from NCO, it isn't even a real person…isn't that something?

---

"Natural. No Game."
Reply:Thanks, guy.
I bet though, if you actually told the CA you were recording the call, they'd hang up in a hurry!

---

SEO Software Se Sniper "Brought SEO to it’s Knees!"
Reply: I always advise people who are sending a total cease and desist to state that the receipt of that notice will act as permission to tape any subsequent telephone calls from them or their agents.

---

Acid Reflux "Drug-Free" Natural cure
Reply:My website has a link to the Taping Laws ( under Misc. Legal Stuff)
In general if there is no expectation of privacy the "2 party" consent is not required. This means if the the "tape" includes a message "this call may be recorded" that there is NO expectation of privacy. It also means that if the call is TO a business phone that is answered by a switchboard or someone other than the party the call is intended for, there is no expectation of privacy.
In addition, even WITHOUT an "expectation of privacy" a call may be legally recorded without consent in ( or from) a 2 party State if there is a "threat" or "harrassment" involved that is by its nature illegal. So if you have disputed with a CA and sent them a total cease and desist, and have proof of their receipt of that letter, then any subsequent calls to you may be recorded as they are in violation of the cease and desist.
I always advise people who are sending a total cease and desist to state that the receipt of that notice will act as permission to tape any subsequent telephone calls from them or their agents.

---

Deborah McCoy "America’s Wedding Planner" is now on CB!
Reply:I vaguely remember that, but my searches keep coming up with nothing. Hopefully, someone will chime in that remembers it specifically.

---

Related posts:

1. Can we record our conversations with the CRA's? [protocall] [cra]
2. CA recorded call warning give me permission to record also? [baddies] [cb]
3. Jeez, I guess I just got 'slammed' by Chase [protector plan] [mispronunciation]
4. Regarding Third Party Disclosure FDCPA [platinum recovery] [recorded message]
5. Debt relief program and tips to tackle the collection agency